I found this comment below in a Watertown Daily Times under an article about the lawsuit that was filed against me, another blogger and up to ten John Does. It was filed by Gary King, Harvey White, Donnie Mason, Marty Mason, Paul Mason, Marlene Burton, Darrell Burton and Frank Giaquinto who identified themselves as Voters for Wind and members of the group, CFG (Citizens for Fair Government).

During the lawsuit brought against JLL, a matter which has been resolved with prejudice, meaning there can be no further legal action, we have followed the comments by Start a Business in Cape Vincent very closely. He/she initially made the claim that he/she does not read my blog but one of his/her seasonal neighbors brought him/her a print out. Start a business in Cape Vincent has repeatedly made false claims about the truthfulness of what I have authored on the Cape Vincent blogs and third party comments authored by others. On repeated occasions Start a Business has fabricated stories without any basis for fact as in the case of his/her most recent post.
I doubt KC, unknown to me, is afraid of what the Judge's scrutiny "will discover in my blog". I certainly was never concerned, and in fact hoped that Judge James McClusky and every other legal mind in the United States, interested in the first amendment would read every single word on my blog. Because, in his recent decision on the motion for dismissal by both bloggers, he said that one of the problems with the plaintiff's complaints were that they took what they claimed out of context without what was authored around them. I suspect the Judge made that decision based on reading and scrutinizing my blog.
My perception and respect for the legal system includes a notion that Judges will be a due diligent scrutinator even if i am the scrutinee.
The following is what the Judge wrote on the first of three issues regarding Pandora's Box of Rock's motion for dismissal.
The post relating to Marty Mason and Donnie Mason set forth in paragraph 17 of the complaint identifies the facts upon which the objectionable statement is made, specifically that both Mason's have contracts with wind developers and that Donnie Mason introduced a resolution before the Town of Cape Vincent Board in an attempt to limit those who may vote in Cape Vincent. The fact that the Masons have contracts with wind developers and that Donnie Mason submitted a resolution seeking to restrict who may vote is the basis of the Defendant's opinion statement that they are not fit to hold office. If the Court were to hold that such a statement is actionable, virtually any criticism of a candidate for office because he supports one position over another would be actionable and the first amendment would be totally gutted.
On that issue, the decision favored the blogger and not Gary King, Harvey White, Donnie Mason, Marty Mason, Paul Mason, Marlene Burton, Darrell Burton and Frank Giaquinto
The second post, alleged in paragraph 18 of the Plaintiffs' complaint as defamatory, Recites that Defendant falsely stated the Plaintiffs were "attempting to take the right away from people to be voters against wind", and 'wanted to deny citizens in our community a choice." Plaintiff King's own Affidavit states that he and the Plaintiffs (who were also identified as supporters of Citizens for Fair Government) gathered to find a solution to stop voting practices which they thought were illegal, and that Plaintiffs supported a position that voters be required to show a driver's license with a Cape Vincent address in order to vote in local elections. This requirement would deny the right to vote of citizens who are legally registered to vote in Cape Vincent who do not possess a driver's license with a Cape Vincent address. Undoubtedly, some of these individuals would vote against pro-wind and/or candidates No evidence has been presented to show this statement is false. Plaintiffs may legitimately believe these people do not have the right to vote in Cape Vincent, but their belief doesn't make the statement false or slanderous.
On that issue, the decision also favored the blogger and not Gary King, Harvey White, Donnie Mason, Marty Mason, Paul Mason, Marlene Burton, Darrell Burton and Frank Giaquinto.
As for Start a Business's statement "that this sad chapter in the Cape's history is over."
I doubt SABINY will find that to be true at least until November. No way! Plaintiff Gary King still has right to discovery on one nebulous issue which I predict will NOT go his way. Another reason this sad chapter is not over is that it appears Mr. King, through his affidavit about the purpose of CFG and the exhibition of the petitions and re-exposing the names on them in public court documents have re-opened some old wounds. This additional assault on our community will make this sad chapter in Cape's history well read right though the November election. It appears that some of those petition signers were very embarrassed when they discovered they were going to be used to pass an illegal voter identification resolution. Some of them told me that they did not understand the petition was going to be used like that. One person who signed the lease told me he had been "hoodwinked".
Ironically, it appears that the CFG is targeting the civil rights of seasonal residents which SABINY claims to be. It also appears to me that the plaintiff's actions were about wind and I believe, voter intimidation. In his decision Judge McClusky wrote, "to state that the subject matter of this lawsuit is not related to the pending application for the development of wind power in the Town of Cape Vincent is beyond comprehension. King's own admission was that Gary King, Harvey White, Donnie Mason, Marty Mason, Paul Mason, Marlene Burton, Darrell Burton and Frank Giaquinto gathered as members of CFG.
SABINY! Holy crap. the CFG is targeting you, too! But, did your assessor get a letter? You know, the one with Harold Wiley's name on it along with "the unauthorized use of Gary King's name"?
As for your false claim about why I stopped comments "only after the hint of a Judge visiting the blog", you have fabricated that story without any basis of fact and you are presenting it to the readers of the Watertown Daily Times as the truth. I have nothing to hide from a Judge or any person who visits my blog.
SABICV, I had several reasons for stopping comments. Some of them are none of your business. One was the very dirty comments directly aimed toward me by Cape Vincent's pro wind. I have them in my files and might share them some day. The rotten stuff from pro wind including a threat I had to report to the police was becoming a routine part of the exercising of my first amendment right to speak out and oppose a contentious community-impacting project and what I perceived as a local government gone astray.
But, that reason was not as significant as the fact that, because of the lawsuit, my blog traffic and email became so busy that I alone could not keep up with the pace. Because of the lawsuit, what was going on in Cape Vincent gained the attention of an international base of friends. I found myself communicating much more to a wider group, including new friends in the legal community who are very interested in SLAPP actions. My personal direction had changed.
So, it appears your claim that I get a fraction of the attendance I once got might be considered libelous and ruining my good reputation. Once you even stated as if it were fact that I get zero readers. Holy crap, I might perceive your actions to be an attempt to hurt my business, if I had a business, and even cause me severe emotional stress if I ever had any.
Oh, and did I mention that I think your ridiculous anti blog blather appears to be an organized attempt by the Cape Democrats and the anti-seasonal CFG to defame my blog and shut me up as part of industrial wind community engagement and the pro wind 2013 political campaign?