Reports claim the decision to pull the plug on the project (Cape Vincent, NY USA) follow years of controversy in the community as the majority of residents were against the plan....ENERGYLIVE NEWS , Feb. 28, 2014



Friday, December 21, 2012

Cape Vincent Town Board letter to PSC - Timing of donations to stakeholders taints the process.


December 20, 2012

Honorable Jeffrey C. Cohen

Acting Secretary, NYS Board of Electric Power Generation Siting and Environment 3 Empire State Plaza

Albany, NY 12223-1350

Re: Case12-F-0410 Cape Vincent Wind Power

Dear Acting Secretary Cohen:

Thank you for your prompt response to our December 12 letter. We appreciate the assurance you have provided that Commissioner Harris will not be a part of, nor have any influence on, the deliberations that lie ahead for us in BP's Article 10 project proposal.

We are somewhat puzzled, however, with your response to our concerns regarding BP offering donations to stakeholders in Cape Vincent. In your letter you state:

“You are correct that providing donations to community groups is not an activity listed in the PIP. Notwithstanding your concerns, the fact that the PIP does not discuss charitable donations to local service groups does not make the plan inadequate or preclude the involvement of any sector of the Cape Vincent community from participating in the Article 10 process.”

We are surprised that you see nothing questionable or unreasonable about BP giving money to stakeholders prior to the time these stakeholders will be asked what they think of BP's project proposal. You state donations do not make the plan inadequate, but adequacy was not the point we tried to make. Our concern was one of ethics and propriety, not adequacy. You also state that donations from BP do not disqualify a stakeholder from participating in the process. Again, our point was not stakeholder participation or eligibility. We were questioning the ethical behavior of the corporation that is supposedly operating under a law and rules which DPS is responsible for administering.

If the practice of donating money to stakeholders is so routine and ubiquitous,then it should have been included in the PIP. If the practice of paying stakeholders is not so unsavory, then why did BP's attorney John Harris and BP's project manager Richard Chandler remain silent when the practice was questioned at their November 6 Article 10 information meeting?

We are sorry, but we do not share the view that paying stakeholders prior to their engagement in public outreach is ethical, acceptable business practice. We believe donations by BP are not by themselves onerous. Rather, it is the timing of these offers that is unseemly and which taints the process.

Mr. Cohen, we would like to close with a constructive suggestion that may help resolve our discomfort on this issue, which is very important to us. We ask that you forward our collective correspondence on the issue of BP offering money to stakeholders to the New York State Joint Commission on Public Ethics and ask them for a advisory opinion. This approach would satisfy our concerns, and hopefully, provide some relief for DPS and the Siting Board as well.

Respectfully yours,

Urban Hirschey – Town Supervisor
Brooks Bradgon – Deputy Supervisor

Michelle Oswald – Town Council

Richard Macsherry – Planning Board Chairman
John Byrne – Town Council Clifford Schneider – Town Council
Robert S. Brown – Planning Board

Cyril Cullen – Planning Board